Distributed problem solving on one platform: The future of effective issue management

For many industrial organizations operating on a global scale, managing issues and problems efficiently enterprise-wide can be a challenge. Different departments, teams, and sites often utilize their own platforms or ad hoc systems to handle issues as they arise. In many cases, problems get routed to centralized departments, such as Health, Safety, and Environmental (HSE) or Risk Management, for resolution. While this approach has served businesses well in the past, it is becoming clear that it may no longer be the most efficient or effective way to manage and solve problems enterprise-wide at scale.

The Challenges of Disparate Platforms

When different teams or departments work with their own isolated platforms or tools to manage problems and issues, it can lead to a range of complications. Each department might rely on different software or manual methods for reporting, tracking, and resolving issues, which leads to fragmented data and inconsistent workflows. In such environments, collaboration between departments becomes more difficult, as teams must navigate a patchwork of systems and processes, often requiring additional time and effort to consolidate information.

This fragmentation can also hinder the organization's ability to identify patterns or trends in the issues being reported. Without a centralized system, the insights needed to make informed, proactive decisions are often hidden or delayed. Furthermore, ad hoc methods, such as relying on email or spreadsheets, can result in missed issues, incomplete data, and ultimately, ineffective problem resolution.

The Case for Centralized Problem Management

In some organizations, issues are funneled to centralized departments such as HSE or Risk Management. This approach brings a certain level of consistency and control, with specialized teams responsible for overseeing the resolution of issues. Centralization ensures that the right people with the necessary expertise are dealing with problems, which can improve response times and ensure regulatory compliance and leads to scalable learnings.

However, the centralization of problem management is not without its drawbacks. One of the primary challenges is the bottleneck effect. As issues from all departments, teams, and locations converge in one central system, it can overwhelm the team responsible for managing them. This leads to delays in resolution and, in some cases, critical issues may go unresolved for too long. Additionally, this approach can create a disconnect between the teams that are directly impacted by the problems and the team that is addressing them. When departments are too distant from the issue resolution process, it can lead to a lack of ownership, miscommunication, and a slower resolution time.

The Pros and Cons of Distributed vs. Centralized Problem-Solving

Distributed Approach:

Pros:

• Flexibility: Teams have the autonomy to manage problems in a way that best suits their specific needs and workflows.
• Faster Resolution: Problems can be addressed quickly at the point of origin without waiting for central approval or intervention.
• Increased Accountability: With distributed problem solving, teams are directly responsible for resolving their own issues, which can promote ownership and engagement.

Cons:

• Data Fragmentation: The lack of a central system (lingua franca) means valuable data can become siloed, making it difficult to identify patterns or get a holistic view of the organization’s issues.
• Inefficiencies: Different departments or teams may be duplicating efforts, leading to wasted resources or redundant processes.
• Lack of Oversight: Without central oversight, some issues may not be flagged or resolved in a timely manner.

Centralized Approach:

Pros:

• Consistency: A central system can standardize how issues are reported and managed, ensuring consistency across the organization.
• Expertise: Centralized departments can apply their specialized knowledge to issues, ensuring that problems are addressed with the right expertise.
• Comprehensive View: A central platform can provide visibility into all issues across the organization, allowing decision-makers to spot trends, manage risks, and allocate resources more effectively.

Cons:

• Bottlenecks: Centralizing all issues can overwhelm a single team, leading to delays and a slow response time.
• Lack of Ownership: With centralized management, departments may feel less engaged or accountable for resolving their own problems.
• Reduced Agility: The central team may not have the full context of every issue, which can lead to slower or less effective solutions.

The Best of Both Worlds: Flexibility and Visibility with a Unified Enterprise Platform 

So, how can organizations overcome the challenges of both completely distributed and completely centralized approaches? The answer lies in adopting a platform that offers the best of both worlds: the flexibility, local expertise of distributed problem solving combined with the visibility, scalable learnings and insights of a centralized system. 

Image